Culture: Some guy by the name of Etan Thomas
on Huff post via
True Hoops bitches about Whitlock being on "their side." Whose sides? Why the Uncle Toms picking on the black community for the sake of being liked by right wingers and making money. There is some deep pseudo Malcolm X wannbe stuff going on in this article but this is the part that is the main theme of complaints about Whitlock. He dared to say something less than positive about another black person.
| I am writing this as a warning. A caution if you will. After speaking with you one on one, I learned, surprisingly, that although we definitely don't see eye to eye on a number of issues, you do have some opinions and thoughts I agree with. I'm not going to call you an Uncle Tom, sell-out, say you're tap dancing for the media, putting down your people so that you can move up the ladder of success in a Clarence Thomas, Ward Connerly, JC Watts-type fashion, because I actually took the time to talk to you. |
When you get to this you realize that this is the voice of the immature segment of the black community, the stick with your people tribalism mentality has yet to thrown away to have an honest non knee-jerk debate. It gets better.
However, you had to see that the overall feeling in the room by the students was that you were in fact grouped with the aforementioned gentlemen and deserving of the previously mentioned labels. I spoke to some of the students at the conclusion of the event, and let me tell you, they did not hold you in high regard. One student said he wished I had more time to speak about holding the few black journalists we have accountable and how glad they were that I stood up to, in his words, "your Uncle Tom way of thinking". You heard the one student get up during the question and answer portion and ask you how you can pride yourself on "amen"ing, as he called it, all of the negative things that the media says about not only us, but the entire hip-hop culture. Hip-hop is not all negatively charged, prison culture embracing, gangster rap music, as you seem to think.
The perception that you are on "their" side is constantly growing. I know that this is not a label you want. Interestingly, you seem to be unaware of this because when I told you that you came across worse than Bill Cosby, you looked at me with eyes of disbelief. Not only did you say that this was not your intention, you vehemently denied those allegations. You looked at me as if I said something utterly ridiculous.
The audience couldn't hear your point about us taking ownership, respecting each other, immersing ourselves in positivity while rejecting the negative stereotypes that are prevalent in society. They couldn't receive your message to abandon any aspect of our own culture that is, in your words "anti-black, anti-education, demeaning, self-destructive, pro drug-dealing and violent." They couldn't hear that from you because it appeared as though you were not on their side. I'm sure you heard the abundance of sighs and moans when your quote about moving the NBA All Star game to Europe was read.
You said in an article entitled "Mayhem main event at NBA All-Star Weekend," that "David Stern seriously needs to consider moving the event out of the country for the next couple of years in hopes that young, hip-hop hoodlums would find another event to terrorize." You also said, "All Star Weekend can no longer remain the Woodstock for parolees, wannabe rap artists and baby's mamas on tax refund vacations." You went on to talk about how you felt as if you were walking in a prison yard when you saw all of the baggy jeans, white t-shirts, doo-rags, etc., and that you were in fear for your life. You completely demonized them to the point that they began to be repulsed by your words before you even spoke them. You don't understand that you were describing the attire of most of the young people attending the forum. Young people in college aspiring to become journalists, lawyers, doctors, engineers, teachers, etc. were put into one big mass of negativity simply because of their clothing. Unfortunately, this is a label that is commonly placed on them by mainstream America. |
Young people in college aspiring to be lawyers, doctors, engineers and teachers don't carry themselves in such a fashion wearing baggy jeans, doo-rags. People that go to college carry themselves in a manner that goes beyond looking like a gangsta off the streets. Of course the idiotic notion that all young black people carry themselves in this offensive fashion is itself a stereotype. The last paragraph of this open letter sums up why a major segment of the black community is still in an immature stage of societal development.
"....Mr. Whitlock, the media wants you to say those things, especially the right-wing media. You are appearing to be on "their" side. You call for new leadership, but I didn't hear you make any recommendations. Of course you will receive an abundance of .attention and praise, as Bob Ryan coined you "Jason Whitlock, the world's last honest man" You said yourself in an article posted on TheBigLead.com, "white people write me love letters when I blast off into the way the media, and a prosecutor tried to crucify the Duke lacrosse players on the word of a couple of black criminal escorts."
Which begs the question, who is benefiting from your comments? What exactly is your goal in writing the articles you write? Is it to help our youth, who because of the fact that you appear to not be on their side find it difficult to receive your message, or is it for another reason? While I understand that the Duke players turned out to be innocent, do you fail to see the way you come across? I know that you don't want to be known as the "Uncle Tom of journalism" as one of the students at the panel referred to you while thanking me for standing up for them. Whether you like it or not, that perception of you is out there. And if you don't do something about it, this label will be your legacy. |
If the youth of Etan are so traumatized by Whitlock's columns because they don't beat around the bush or because they come from a perspective they and you think comes from an "Uncle Tom" or some racist white guy, the problem is not on Whitlock. It shows a severe lack of maturity of dealing with issues without it being an us vs them. This is the retarded version of Tavis Smiley's " Skinfolk but not kinfolk" line. I seriously doubt Whitlock or Bill Cosby are going to lose sleep or have their legacy of being Uncle Toms because they don't subscribe to the victimology mentality you and some other black people embrace. You are not representative of the entire black community.
But here is a question, the liberal white folks that support your way of backward thinking in the huff comments and elsewhere. Why are they so eager to embrace your message of us vs them? Why are they so happy to decry folks who don't toe the liberal way of thinking that black people should act in a certain way? Are you sure those people have the best interests of blacks in mind or reacting in a way of a certain place black people occupy in their ideal society?