I can't wrap around the thought that Scott Brown can win Ted Kennedy's seat in that state. Up till now all you had to do is put anything on the ballot with a D in front of it and it gets elected. Now the fact he is this close is an amazing win and shows how unpopular Obama's policies have become even in a state any Dem should have a cakewalk election.
Brown has shown you don't need the national party machine, that you can run against Obama's signature policies and get support, you can be a fiscal conservative and run to the right of the moderate Republicans. This is just one successful template that conservatives can run all over the country with parts being tailored made to their region and be successful.
I just can't think Brown will win though, I hope I am wrong.
But on the notion of the black vote, when you see white liberals such as Michael Tomasky post stuff like this as if black people need a dog whistle
to vote for Obama.
Should Obama visit? I'd say no, if I were advising him. If he goes in there and she loses, then the loss will be absolutely tied right around his neck. Too big a risk. Yes, it would be anyway, but not to same extent as if he went in there and she lost.
At the same time, something extraordinary has to be done in the state to awaken black voter turnout - to let people know that this race isn't about Coakley, but it's about Obama, and if she loses, there will be thundering declarations that his presidency is essentially over. I have no idea whether that's happening.
Guardian: it's about the national right's attempt to make Obama a one-term president, and saturate black radio. That would get the vote out. She'd win. She'd even win easily, I think, if that were done properly. But she and her people have hardly shown themselves to be the sharpest tacks in the box.
Coakley is in trouble which means Obama is in trouble. BLACK PEOPLE TO THE POLLS! 'cause Obama is a liberal black and that is how black people should think all the time.